Jump to content

Patristics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Patrologia)
Philip Schaff's The Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers.

Patristics, also known as Patrology, is a branch of theological studies focused on the writings and teachings of the Church Fathers, between the 1st to 8th centuries CE. Scholars analyze texts from both orthodox and heretical authors. Patristics emerged as a distinct discipline in the 19th century, it was supported by critical editions like Patrologia Latina and Patrologia Graeca. The field employs textual analysis, archaeology, and historical criticism to analyze early Christianity’s doctrinal, cultural, and intellectual development, incorporating traditions beyond Greek and Latin, such as Syriac, Coptic, Armenian, and Ethiopian.

Etymology

[edit]

Patrology, derived from the Latin pater (father) and Greek logos (discourse), primarily refers to the study of the Church Fathers and serves as an introduction to early Christian writings. Historically, it also included large compilations of these writings, such as Patrologia Latina and Patrologia Graeca by Migne.[1]

The term patristics similarly originates from pater in Latin and πᾰτήρ in Greek, both meaning "father," and was introduced by English philosopher Isaac Taylor.[2] Meanwhile, Patrologia was coined by Johann Gerhard, who published a book by the same name in 1653.[3] The formal classification of patristics as a distinct theological discipline was later established by Johann Franz Buddeus in his Historical and Systematic Introduction to Theology (1730).[4]

Scope

[edit]

Patristics is the study of the writings and thought of the Church Fathers, theologians active from the late 1st century to the 8th century CE during the Patristic Age.[5] Closely linked to Church history and early Christian doctrine, it analyzes primary sources that shaped Christian theology, including polemical writings, orations, sermons, letters, and poems, as well as systematic treatises on doctrine and works of biblical exegesis and scriptural commentary. Additionally, Patristic texts span diverse traditions, cultural contexts, and languages, including Greek, Latin, Syriac, Ethiopian, Armenian, and Coptic.[6] The Church Fathers played a key role in defending orthodox Christianity against heresies and interpreting the faith.[5]

Modern scholars, such as Shawn J. Wilhite (2024), define Patristics as spanning from 90–750 CE and incorporating both orthodox and heretical writings for historical context.[7][8] The field employs a multidisciplinary approach, integrating textual analysis, archaeology, art history, philosophy, and religious history to reconstruct early Christianity’s intellectual and cultural landscape.[9]

Patrology and Patristics

[edit]

Some scholars, particularly in Germany, distinguish patrology from patristics. Josef Fessler defines patrology as the study of the authenticity, authority, and use of the Church Fathers’ works, while patristics focuses on their theological thought. Karl Keating similarly describes patrology as the study of the Fathers as historical figures, whereas patristics examines their teachings. However, these distinctions are not widely observed, as both fields overlap within theological and literary studies.[10][11]

Historical development

[edit]

Early engagement (Pre 5th century)

[edit]

Eusebius is identified as the earliest to document the history of Christian literature. According to his 4th century book Ecclesiastical History, states his intention to report on those who were ambassadors of the word of God by speech or by pen, listing their names, numbers, and ages. Thus, his work is a crucial source of Patrology, especially as many writings he quotes have been lost, making him the only source of information for some ecclesiastical authors.[12]

During the same century, Jerome was the pioneer in documenting the history of Christian theological literature. In his work De viris illustribus (On Illustrious Men), he aimed to address the mockery from pagans who often ridiculed the intellectual capabilities of Christians.[12]

With the advent of the printing press in the 15th century, interest in patristic writings surged. Medieval scholars, Protestant Reformers, and Caroline divines extensively studied the Church Fathers, particularly figures such as Augustine, Jerome, and John Chrysostom. However, these studies were often influenced by apologetic and polemical lenses, reflecting the theological debates of the time.[13]

Emergence as a discipline (15-29th century)

[edit]

Modern patristics emerged in the 19th century, spurred by institutions, such as universities, seminaries, and academic conferences. The development of scholarly tools, including critical editions of texts (e.g., Patrologia Latina) and journals like Studia Patristica.[14] Additionally, continued ecumenical dialogue reduced tensions between Chalcedonian and Oriental Orthodox traditions allowing for revitalized interest in non-Greek/Latin Fathers.[15]

During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, scholars in Great Britain, Germany, France, and Italy made significant philological advancements, acquiring and cataloging new manuscripts. The discovery of the Nag Hammadi Gnostic library and John Chrysostom’s baptismal catecheses on Mount Athos (1955) were major milestones.[16]

With the introduction of microfilming technology, institutions like the British Library, Vatican Library, and Bibliothèque Nationale preserved and expanded access to patristic manuscripts. Since the 1940s, scholarly efforts have focused on careful textual revisions and comparative analyses rather than new manuscript discoveries.[16]

Discipline issues

[edit]

Beyond the Western world

[edit]

Modern scholars have increasingly recognized diverse Christian communities beyond Rome and Constantinople. This shift has led to a more nuanced understanding of the Church Fathers' impact across different traditions. Some theologians revered in one tradition were considered heretical in another, highlighting the theological diversity of early Christianity.[17]

The Western definition of the Patristic Age has also been re-evaluated. Traditionally, Venerable Bede (d. 735) marks its conclusion in the Latin West, and John of Damascus (d. 749) in the Greek East. However, later Byzantine theologians such as Symeon the New Theologian and Gregory Palamas, along with Oriental Orthodox figures, continue to be studied in Patristics. This reevaluation challenges Eurocentric periodization and acknowledges the continued intellectual and theological evolution of Christianity beyond the traditional Western framework.[17]

Major centres of thought

[edit]
See also: Early centers of Christianity and Pentarchy

The major locations of the early Church fathers were Rome, Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch, and the area of western north Africa around Carthage. Milan and Jerusalem were also sites.[18]

Theological developments

[edit]

Major focuses for these theologians during the period are, in chronological order:[19]

  1. Christianity's relationship with Judaism
  2. Establishment of the New Testament canon
  3. Apologetics (the 'defense' or 'explanation' of Christianity)
  4. Doctrinal discussions that sought to achieve consistency of faith, in particular within the Christianized Roman Empire.

Furthermore, McGrath (1998) notes several major areas of theology can be seen to have developed during the Patristic Period: the extent of the New Testament canon, the role of tradition, the fixing of the ecumenical creeds, the two natures of Christ, the doctrine of the Trinity, the doctrine of the Church, and the doctrine of divine grace.[20]

Notable Church Fathers

[edit]
Main article: List of Church Fathers

The key individuals of patristic literature include:[21]

Contemporary approaches

[edit]

Understanding Patristics in the 21st century presents several challenges. McGrath identifies four key difficulties: the perceived lack of relevance in some theological debates, the influence of classical philosophy, the doctrinal diversity among the Church Fathers, and the divisions between Greek (Eastern) and Latin (Western) theological traditions, particularly in their use of philosophical frameworks.[22]

In response to these challenges, neo-patristic and post-patristic approaches advocate for reinterpreting or critically reassessing the Church Fathers in light of modern developments. These perspectives argue that early Christian writings reflect the concerns of their historical context and may require adaptation. However, these approaches remain controversial among orthodox theologians, who caution that such reinterpretations could undermine traditional theological continuity.[23][24]

Sources and collection of texts

[edit]

Orignal language collection

[edit]

A vast number of patristic texts are preserved in their original languages through major scholarly collections. One of the most comprehensive efforts is Jacques Paul Migne’s Patrologia Latina and Patrologia Graeca, which compile extensive writings from the Latin and Greek Church Fathers, respectively.[25]

For texts in Syriac and other Eastern languages, the Patrologia Orientalis (formerly Patrologia Syriaca) provides a significant, though incomplete, collection. It is largely supplemented by the Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium, which includes additional Eastern Christian writings.[26][27]

Other critical editions and re-edited patristic texts, including newly discovered works and revised attributions, are found in:

Peer-reviewed journals

[edit]

Several peer-reviewed journals are recognized for their contributions to the study of early Christianity and Patristics. These journals, many of which are accessible online, include:[28]

See also

[edit]

Ancient Christian texts and collections

[edit]

Academic fields and studies

[edit]

Key theological and historical topics

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Stausberg, M., & Vevaina, Y. S.-D. (Eds.). (2015). The Wiley Blackwell companion to patristics (p. 51). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. ISBN 978-1-118-43871-8. https://slavicabyzantina.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/parry_kenneth_the_wiley_blackwell_companion_to_z-lib.org_.pdf
  2. ^ Clark, E. A. (2008). From patristics to early Christian studies. In S. A. Harvey & D. G. Hunter (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of early Christian studies (pp. 7–41). Oxford University Press. https://elearning.unito.it/scienzeumanistiche/pluginfile.php/222457/mod_resource/content/2/Clark_From%20Patristics%20to%20Early%20Christian%20Studies_39%2078.pdf
  3. ^ Quasten, J. (1986). Patrology: Volume I, The beginnings of patristic literature. Christian Classics, Inc (p. 1). (Original work published 1950).
  4. ^ Bitton-Ashkelony, B., de Bruyn, T., & Harrison, C. (Eds.). (2015). Patristic studies in the twenty-first century: Proceedings of an international conference to mark the 50th anniversary of the International Association of Patristic Studies (p. 368). Brepols. ISBN 978-2-503-55919-3. https://www.antikes-christentum.de/fileadmin/_migrated/tx_nimediathek/Patristics_and_Theology.pdf
  5. ^ a b Cross, F. L., & Livingstone, E. A. (Eds.). (2005). Patristics. In The Oxford dictionary of the Christian Church (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780192802903.001.0001/acref-9780192802903-e-5194?rskey=wbbGE1&result=6
  6. ^ Humfress, C. (2015). Patristic sources. The Cambridge Companion to Roman Law, 97-118.
  7. ^ Wilhite, S. J. (2024). The state of patristic studies. Religious Studies Review, 50(4), 743–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsr.17552
  8. ^ (Quasten, 1986, p. 1)
  9. ^ Kannengiesser, C. (1989). Fifty years of patristica. Theological Studies, 50(4), 640. Retrieved from https://theologicalstudies.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/50.4.1.pdf
  10. ^ "Patrology". Catholic Answers. Retrieved 2023-07-05.
  11. ^ Keating, Karl (1988). Catholicism and Fundamentalism: The Attack on "Romanism" by "Bible Christians". San Francisco: Ignatius Press. p. 330. ISBN 9780898701951.
  12. ^ a b (Quasten, 1986, p. 1)
  13. ^ Clark, E. A. (2008). "From Patristics to Early Christian Studies" (PDF). In Harvey, S. A.; Hunter, D. G. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Studies. Oxford University Press. pp. 7–41. ISBN 978-0199271566.
  14. ^ Clark, E. A. (2008). From patristics to early Christian studies. In S. A. Harvey & D. G. Hunter (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of early Christian studies (pp. 7–41). Oxford University Press. https://elearning.unito.it/scienzeumanistiche/pluginfile.php/222457/mod_resource/content/2/Clark_From%20Patristics%20to%20Early%20Christian%20Studies_39%2078.pdf
  15. ^ Clark, E. A. (2008). "From Patristics to Early Christian Studies" (PDF). In Harvey, S. A.; Hunter, D. G. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Studies. Oxford University Press. pp. 7–41. ISBN 978-0199271566.
  16. ^ a b (Kannengiesser, 1989, p. 640)
  17. ^ a b Stausberg, M., & Vevaina, Y. S.-D. (Eds.). (2015). The Wiley Blackwell companion to patristics (p. 4). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. ISBN 978-1-118-43871-8. https://slavicabyzantina.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/parry_kenneth_the_wiley_blackwell_companion_to_z-lib.org_.pdf
  18. ^ McGrath. op.cit. pp. 20–22.
  19. ^ McGrath. op.cit. Ch. 1.
  20. ^ McGrath. op.cit. pp. 27–37.
  21. ^ "Patristic literature | Definition, History, Fathers, Works, Period, & Facts | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2025-02-04.
  22. ^ McGrath. op.cit. pp. 23.
  23. ^ Metropolitan of Nafpaktus ΝΕΟΠΑΤΕΡΙΚΗ ΚΑΙ ΜΕΤΑΠΑΤΕΡΙΚΗ "ΘΕΟΛΟΓΙΑ"
  24. ^ Dr. Triantafyllos Sioulis, «Πατερικός φονταμενταλισμός» ή «μετα-πατερική θεολογική θολούρα» Archived 2011-11-01 at the Wayback Machine
  25. ^ Bauer, W. (1988). Griechisch-deutsches Wörterbuch zu den Schriften des Neuen Testaments und der frühchristlichen Literatur (Vol. 43, Issue 2). de gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110860269
  26. ^ Wallace-Hadrill, D. S. (1974). Eusebius of Caesarea’s Commentary on Luke: Its Origin and Early History. Harvard Theological Review, 67(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0017816000003151
  27. ^ Lang, D. M. (1957). Recent Work on the Georgian New Testament. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 19(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0041977x00119214
  28. ^ Estelle-Holmer, Suzanne. "Yale University Library Research Guides: Early Christianity and Patristics: Journals". guides.library.yale.edu. Retrieved 2025-02-04.

Sources

[edit]
[edit]

Audio

Online collections

Others

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patristics&oldid=1273984996#Patrology_vs._patristics"